Pulmonary Function and Aerobic Capacity Responses to Equine Assisted Therapy in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mohamed A Abdel Ghafar, Osama R Abdelraouf, Amr A Abdel-Aziem and 4 others
PMID 35652929WHAT IT FOUND
Adding hippotherapy to Schroth exercises improved lung function and walking distance more than Schroth exercises alone in 45 adolescents with mild scoliosis.
Both groups improved, so the extra benefit of riding is the finding, not that Schroth does not work.
Key findings
01The interaction between time and group was significant (F = 16.79, p = 0.001), and post-intervention values for FVC, FEV1, MVV, FEV1/FVC, and 6MWT were all significantly higher in the hippotherapy-plus-Schroth group than in the Schroth-only group (all p < 0.05).
02Post-intervention means: FVC 2.97 vs 2.65 L (p = 0.027), FEV1 2.64 vs 2.56 L (p = 0.035), MVV 83.64 vs 79.14 L/min (p = 0.017), FEV1/FVC 94.13% vs 88.29% (p = 0.013), 6MWT 677.08 vs 663.22 m (p = 0.029), experimental versus control.
03The Schroth-only control group also showed significant within-group improvement on every measure (all p < 0.05), meaning the standard scoliosis exercise programme alone produced meaningful gains in pulmonary function and walking distance.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only adolescents with mild scoliosis (Cobb 10 to 20 degrees) were included, so the findings cannot be extended to moderate or severe curves. The study was single-blind: participants knew whether they were riding a horse, which could influence effort and reporting. Cobb angle was not remeasured after the intervention, so it is unclear whether any spinal change contributed to the pulmonary gains. No electromyography was performed, so the authors could not verify which respiratory muscles were actually activated. Only one scoliosis-specific exercise programme (Schroth) was used as the co-intervention; the result may not generalise to other scoliosis exercise methods. Follow-up was limited to the 10-week intervention period; no data on whether the gains were maintained. Energy expenditure and metabolic equivalents were not measured, so the aerobic mechanism is inferred rather than directly quantified.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest. No funding source is named in the text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that hippotherapy alone improves lung function. Both groups received Schroth exercises, and the Schroth-only group improved significantly on every measure. The finding is that adding riding on top of Schroth produced a further, statistically significant gain. Also note the study was single-blind: participants knew whether they were in the riding group, which can influence how hard they push during spirometry and the walk test.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →