Preliminary study on the treatment of prepubescent adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Schroth exercises combined with core exercises.
Han-Tao Jiang, Jia-Yan Chen, Feng-Ze Wu and 3 others
PMID 40980155WHAT IT FOUND
In five prepubescent adolescents with scoliosis, six months of Schroth plus core exercises coincided with lower average spinal curve angle (Cobb 24.12° to 12.68°) and better pain, function, and self-image.
With no control group, this is not proof of benefit.
Key findings
01Mean Cobb angle changed from 24.12° ± 4.80° at baseline to 12.68° ± 8.11° post-intervention (p = 0.012).
02SRS pain scores improved from 3.58 ± 0.08 to 4.18 ± 0.16 (P < 0.001), and SRS self-image scores improved from 3.48 ± 0.08 to 3.96 ± 0.13 (P < 0.001).
03SRS function scores improved from 3.84 ± 0.05 to 4.16 ± 0.11 (P = 0.011), and SRS mental health scores improved from 3.80 ± 0.10 to 4.10 ± 0.07 (P < 0.001).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study analysed only 5 patients, after exclusions from an initial cohort of 27, so the result is very preliminary. It was retrospective and had no control group, so improvement cannot be confidently attributed to the exercises rather than natural growth patterns, spontaneous regression, or other unmeasured factors. Schroth exercises and core exercises were delivered together, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. Follow-up was only six months and did not span pubertal growth spurts, when scoliosis progression risk is highest. The study did not standardize adjunct activities such as school sports or daily posture habits, which could have influenced outcomes. Participants were only prepubescent patients with moderate curves (Cobb angle 20°-40°), so the findings may not apply to older adolescents, smaller or larger curves, or patients with other conditions.
Declared interests
The authors state that financial support was received for the research and/or publication. The study was supported by the Taizhou Science and Technology Project (Grant No. 24ywa34).
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that Schroth plus core exercises caused the curve reduction or is better than bracing or Schroth-only protocols. Only 5 prepubescent patients were studied retrospectively with no control group, and both Schroth exercises and core exercises were given together, so the contribution of either component cannot be separated.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →