Predictors of Disability Attributed to Symptoms of Increased Interrecti Distance in Women after Childbirth: An Observational Study.
Martin Eriksson Crommert, Ida Flink, Catharina Gustavsson
PMID 33598709WHAT IT FOUND
In women with increased abdominal separation after childbirth, disability from its symptoms was mainly linked to lumbopelvic pain, fear of movement, and emotional distress.
The actual abdominal gap was not related to disability.
Key findings
01Lumbopelvic pain was the strongest contributor to disability, followed by fear-avoidance beliefs and emotional distress.
02The measured interrecti distance, body mass index, and physical activity were not significant predictors of disability.
03The six measured factors together accounted for 60% of the variance in disability.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Women volunteered through newspapers, childcare centres, social media, and a blog, so those with more symptoms may have been more likely to take part. The study is cross-sectional, so it cannot show whether pain, fear-avoidance, distress, or disability caused the others. The disability measure was a modified Pain Disability Index, with pain removed and the scale changed from 0 to 9 per item, giving a maximum total of 63; this version was not validated. The sample lacked obese women, so the absence of a BMI-physical activity relationship may not apply to more diverse populations. Accelerometer counts may not capture avoidance of specific activities such as lifting, so physical activity findings may miss relevant fears. No norm values for the modified Pain Disability Index in the general population were available. All participants already had an increased interrecti distance, so the study does not compare them with women without it.
Declared interests
Funded by Uppsala-Örebro Regional Research Council, Sweden. The funders played no role in the design, conduct, or reporting of the study.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that the size of the interrecti distance causes disability or that treating it will reduce symptoms. The measured interrecti distance was not a significant predictor of disability, and the study did not test any treatment.