Pilot testing of the spring operated wearable enhancer for arm rehabilitation (SpringWear).
Ji Chen, Peter S Lum
PMID 29499712WHAT IT FOUND
SpringWear did not consistently help 13 chronic stroke patients complete functional tasks, although it increased maximum shoulder flexion, elbow extension and forearm rotation, and increased forward reach workspace by 19%.
Key findings
01Nine subjects could not complete the functional tasks without assistance, and only one subject changed from failure to success with assistance.
02During range-of-motion tests, assistance increased maximum shoulder flexion by 27.6 ± 17.8 degrees, elbow extension by 18.7 ± 13.2 degrees, and forearm pronation/supination by 38.8 ± 32.2 degrees.
03Index finger PIP extension increased by 16.2 ± 20.3 degrees with assistance, even though the device did not directly assist the fingers.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a single-session pilot in 13 chronic stroke patients, with no control group and no rehabilitation training period, so it cannot show lasting improvement. The main outcomes were joint angles and reach workspace, not standardized clinical functional scores or daily-life use. The device assisted shoulder, elbow and forearm together, so the contribution of each joint's springs cannot be separated. Assistance shifted starting positions, so total range of motion did not increase at shoulder and forearm even when maximum angles increased. Functional task success was poor: nine subjects could not complete the tasks, and assistance did not consistently turn failures into successes. The device was not tested with HandSOME, so combined effect on hand function and ADL was not evaluated. Only the index finger was measured, using manual video analysis, so thumb and other finger movement were not assessed. Manual adjustment of spring stiffness may be impractical when spasticity changes quickly. The device is bulky, may interfere with activities, and requires a caregiver to help put it on. Early design problems were fixed for later subjects, so all 13 did not use exactly the same setup.
Declared interests
Funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health and the Catholic University of America. No commercial sponsor or author conflict statement appears in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that SpringWear improves functional ADL performance. It increased proximal joint angles and forward reach workspace, but nine subjects could not complete the functional tasks and only one changed from failure to success with assistance.