Patient-centered goal-setting in stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review.
Inge Ris, Mille Nabsen Marwaa, Rikke Westengaard Nielsen and 2 others
PMID 41924530WHAT IT FOUND
Goal-setting in stroke rehabilitation varies widely, with no standard procedure ensuring it is patient-centered.
Most studies focused on initial goal-setting, while ongoing monitoring, evaluation, and coordination between different care sectors were rarely described or implemented.
Key findings
01There is no general procedure to ensure goal-setting is patient-centered, with practice varying between therapist-led, team-led, and patient-led approaches.
02Goal-setting activities are more frequent in the first phase of rehabilitation, while ongoing monitoring and evaluation tools are described less often.
03Coordination across different disciplines and sectors is seldom described, and none of the included studies focused specifically on cross-sectoral coherence.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The review excluded acute phase rehabilitation, so findings do not apply to goal-setting in the immediate post-stroke period. Studies focusing specifically on aphasia rehabilitation were excluded, limiting relevance to speech-language pathology for communication disorders. The search was limited to Western high-income countries, so findings may not apply to other healthcare systems. Grey literature (such as conference papers or theses) was excluded, which may have missed relevant information. As a scoping review, it maps the extent of research but does not assess the quality of the included studies or the effectiveness of the goal-setting interventions described.
Declared interests
The authors declared that no financial support was received for the work or its publication.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume that the variability in goal-setting practices implies a lack of skill among clinicians. The review highlights that organizational factors, such as lack of time, resources, and standardized procedures, heavily influence whether goal-setting is patient-centered. It also warns against generalizing these findings to acute care or aphasia-specific rehabilitation, as those areas were explicitly excluded.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →