Parents' Perceptions: Environments and the Contextual Strategies of Parents to Support the Participation of Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder-A Descriptive Population-Based Study from Switzerland.
Beate Krieger, Albine Moser, Thomas Morgenthaler and 2 others
PMID 36538129WHAT IT FOUND
Half of parents reported more home, school, and community supports than barriers; the other half did not report clear supports or barriers.
Sensory overload and social demands were common barriers. Parents often described preparing, accompanying, and motivating their children.
Key findings
01Half of parents reported clear supports and barriers, and among them both age groups reported more supports than barriers across home, school, and community.
02Sensory quality and social demands of activities were strong barriers in home, school, and community settings.
03Parents most often described strategies involving people and activities, including motivating, accompanying, preparing in advance, and adapting activities.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample was self-selected and may not represent all families. After consent, the enrollment rate was 85% and the completion rate was 73%, meaning a quarter of participants were lost after instructions or during completion. The sample had higher education than official statistics, and rural families were overrepresented. In the study, 57% lived in rural areas and 42% were urban or suburban, while Swiss statistics report 74% urban or suburban. Children were described by parents as having high-functioning autism features, so findings may not apply to children with more severe communication, independence, or behaviour challenges. All information was parent-reported, with no child self-report or independent observation, and parent reports can under-rate or over-rate environment and participation. The study was cross-sectional, so it cannot show that any strategy caused better participation or that perceptions change from childhood to adolescence. Data were collected during lockdown, although parents were asked to answer about before lockdown; pandemic effects could not be controlled. Some answers were missing, including 15-20% for informal friendships and social media contacts, and attitudes had the lowest answer rate at 108 of 115.
The easy way to misread this
Do not treat the reported strategies as tested interventions that improve participation. This was a parent survey of perceptions at one time, not a treatment trial, so it cannot show that any strategy caused better participation.