OTRCTJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021

On the way home: a BCI-FES hand therapy self-managed by sub-acute SCI participants and their caregivers: a usability study.

Anna Zulauf-Czaja, Manaf K H Al-Taleb, Mariel Purcell and 3 others

PMID 33632262

WHAT IT FOUND

Caregivers and SCI users learned to run BCI hand therapy after 4 to 5 OT-led sessions, but effectiveness was not shown because participants also had usual therapy and natural recovery.

Do not treat this as evidence the device improves hand function.

Key findings

01Pairs that completed training felt confident that 4 or 5 OT-led sessions were enough to continue independently.

02No conclusion about hand-function improvement can be drawn: only three pairs completed enough independent sessions for a final assessment, and participants also attended conventional therapy.

03Users and caregivers reported that headset setup and software steps were difficult, and caregiver mental demand was linked to setup time.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

No control group was used, so any change cannot be separated from natural recovery or usual therapy. Only seven pairs completed training and only three pairs completed enough independent sessions for final assessment, so effectiveness was not thoroughly investigated. Sessions took place in a hospital research space, not at home, so real home noise, travel, and daily demands may change usability. Training and self-managed sessions were supervised by researchers or OTs, which may have changed stress and performance. Some pairs had sparse sessions because many people were needed, which made donning and BCI use harder. One pair withdrew after one session, leaving limited data. Participants were sub-acute SCI with varying injury levels and muscle grades, so results may not apply to all SCI patients. OTs noted older users, poor FES response, eyesight, shaky hands, and a narrow recruitment window as barriers, so selection matters.

Declared interests

Funding was provided by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, a RAE/Leverhume Senior Researcher Fellowship, and Digital Health & Care Institute Scotland. The supplied text gives no competing-interest statement.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that BCI-FES improves hand function after SCI. The study had no control group, participants also received usual therapy, natural recovery was ongoing, and only three pairs completed enough independent sessions for final assessment.

Read it on PubMed →