Neural auditory encoding and performance in speech-in-noise perception: a pilot study.
Manoella Helena Lucera, Pamela Papile Lunardelo, Humberto de Oliveira Simões and 1 others
PMID 41379202WHAT IT FOUND
Faster and larger neural responses to a /DA/ syllable were associated with better speech-in-noise scores in 28 young native Brazilian Portuguese speakers, especially for consonant timing and vowel encoding.
Key findings
01Shorter latencies for components A and C and greater amplitudes for components A and D were associated with better speech-in-noise perception.
02The Portuguese Sentence Lists signal-to-noise ratio averaged -0.73 dB, with values from -4.6 dB to 1.6 dB.
03All frequency-following response components were identified in all 28 participants, except component C, which was present in 27 of 28 participants.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample was small, with 28 analysed participants, so the findings are preliminary. The participants were young undergraduate and graduate students with normal hearing and adequate mental status, so the results do not show what happens in patients with hearing loss, cognitive impairment, or older age. No normative reference values were available for the Portuguese Sentence Lists test, so the study could not determine whether the observed speech-in-noise scores were typical or impaired. The design was observational and cross-sectional, so the reported relationships are associations rather than proof that frequency-following response measures cause or predict speech-in-noise difficulty. Five participants were excluded because recordings had too many artifacts from power line interference. The sample was limited to native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese, so the findings should not be directly extrapolated to speakers of other languages.
Declared interests
The authors declared no financial support.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that frequency-following response testing can diagnose speech-in-noise difficulty in patients. The study was a small pilot with 28 young adults with normal hearing, and no normative reference values were available for the speech-in-noise test.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →