Mixed Methods Findings from a Stepped Wedge Hybrid Implementation Trial of ATTAIN NAV: A Mental Health Family Navigation Intervention for Autistic Youth.
Nicole A Stadnick, Kassandra Martinez, Felice Navarro and 10 others
PMID 40338511WHAT IT FOUND
Standard family navigation for autistic youth without added messaging or dashboards gave caregivers higher satisfaction, faster first mental health appointments, and greater child behaviour improvements than technology-enhanced navigation.
Technology-enhanced navigation produced more contacts and referrals.
Key findings
01Standard family navigation produced higher caregiver satisfaction and faster first mental health appointments than technology-enhanced family navigation (B = -0.38, B = -0.95, B = 16.18).
02Both navigation conditions reduced child behaviour problems, but standard family navigation showed sharper reductions and post ECBI t-scores fell below the clinical cutoff (intensity mean 57.20; problem mean 56.05).
03Technology-enhanced navigation produced more services referred (B = 0.96) and more and longer contacts (B = 10.69 and B = 10.79), but caregivers did not explicitly discuss the technology enhancements.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The analyzed sample was 56 caregiver-child dyads, below the planned 160 families, so the study is smaller than intended. The trial was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, and a pause in primary care services disrupted recruitment. Navigator turnover occurred, and one navigator was assigned to each condition, so differences between conditions may partly reflect navigator differences. Most outcomes were caregiver self-reports, except navigator fidelity. The qualitative interviews included 14 caregivers and did not explicitly capture experiences with the technology enhancements. Participants were largely privately insured and had relatively similar household income and education, so families with greater socioeconomic distress may not be represented. The paper does not name a single primary outcome, so it is not clear which result was the main test. The trial compared whole conditions, so it did not isolate the effect of each technology component.
Declared interests
The supplied text names the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health as funder and does not include an author conflict-of-interest statement.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that technology-enhanced family navigation is ineffective. The study did not isolate the effect of the technology components, both navigation conditions improved child behaviour and parent activation, and caregivers did not explicitly discuss the technology enhancements.