Metrics extracted from a single wearable sensor during sit-stand transitions relate to mobility impairment and fall risk in people with multiple sclerosis.
Lindsey J Tulipani, Brett Meyer, Dale Larie and 2 others
PMID 32615409WHAT IT FOUND
Adding a single thigh sensor to the 30-second chair stand test helped identify people with multiple sclerosis at risk of falls more accurately than counting repetitions alone.
The sensor captured how slowly and cautiously participants stood up, which correlated with balance confidence and fatigue scores.
Key findings
01A model using only three accelerometer metrics from a single thigh sensor classified fallers with 74% accuracy, slightly outperforming the standard count of repetitions.
02Fallers took longer to stand up and sit down, and showed lower peak acceleration in the thigh, compared to non-fallers.
03The sensor-derived metrics correlated moderately with clinical measures of disease severity, balance confidence, and fatigue.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study had a small sample size of 38 participants, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Participants were ambulatory without assistive devices, so the results do not apply to people with MS who use walkers or wheelchairs. The classification models were cross-validated within the same small cohort, not tested on a new, independent group of patients, so the reported accuracy may be optimistic. The study used a specific type of research-grade sensor; it is unclear if consumer-grade devices or smartphone apps would yield the same metrics. Fall status was determined by self-report over six months, which can be subject to recall bias.
Declared interests
One author reports consulting for EMD Serono, Biogen, and Alexion, and research funding from Biogen. Another author reports stock ownership in MC10, Inc. (the sensor manufacturer) and Impellia, Inc., consulting for HX Innovations Inc. and University of Washington, and research funding from MC10, Inc. and Epicore Biosystems, Inc.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume that a smartphone app can currently replicate these findings. The study used specific research-grade sensors with defined sampling rates and filtering methods, and the models have not been validated in a new, independent population. The slight improvement in accuracy over counting repetitions is promising but not yet ready for clinical decision-making.