Longitudinal development of language and fine motor skills is correlated, but not coupled, in a childhood atypical cohort.
Marie K Deserno, Delia Fuhrmann, Sander Begeer and 3 others
PMID 35470698WHAT IT FOUND
Early skill level in one domain did not predict rate of change in the other.
Language and fine motor growth rates were strongly correlated, but that did not show a driving effect.
Key findings
01There was no significant cross-domain coupling: starting level in one domain did not predict rate of change in the other.
02The correlation between language and fine motor growth rates was extremely high (0.935/0.876), especially for receptive language and fine motor.
03The atypical outcome group had lower scores, slower growth, and wider individual differences in language and fine motor trajectories.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The atypical group was smaller than the typical group (74 versus 165), which limited the multigroup comparisons. The best multigroup models still had relatively poor fit overall, and differences among complex models were marginal. Language and motor abilities were assessed with one rater-reported measure, the MSEL, which may not capture all variability in language acquisition. The study used secondary data and could not use auxiliary variables for missing data. This limits generalizability. No intervention was tested, so the paper cannot show whether therapy changes these trajectories.
Declared interests
The authors disclosed financial support from ERC, NWO, the Sir Henry Wellcome Trust, MRC, the Van der Gaag Grant, the Amsterdam University Fund, and ZonMW. The BASIS project was supported by the UK Medical Research Council, the BASIS funding consortium led by Autistica, and EU-AIMS. No other conflicts of interest are reported.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that early fine motor problems cause later language delays or that language problems drive motor delays. The study found growth rates were strongly correlated, but no evidence that starting level in one domain predicted change in the other.