PTOTOtherJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2017

KAPS (kinematic assessment of passive stretch): a tool to assess elbow flexor and extensor spasticity after stroke using a robotic exoskeleton.

Andrew Centen, Catherine R Lowrey, Stephen H Scott and 2 others

PMID 28629415

WHAT IT FOUND

A robotic elbow stretch test found abnormal movement responses in people after stroke, including some without clinical spasticity.

It may reveal resistance missed by Ashworth and Tardieu scores, but it is not yet a routine clinical tool.

Key findings

01The fastest 600 ms passive elbow stretch best distinguished stroke participants from healthy controls.

02During flexion movements, between-arm peak velocity difference identified impairment in 59% of participants without spasticity.

03Some participants failed all parameters in both directions despite clinical classification of spasticity in only one muscle group.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was a tool-development study, not a test that KAPS improves patient outcomes or guides treatment. The sample lacked people with high clinical spasticity, so results apply mainly to none-to-moderate levels. The extensors-only group had only 3 participants, making subgroup patterns unstable. Eight healthy controls were removed as outliers, while Table 1 lists 96 healthy controls. The speed order was not randomised and the more affected arm was tested first, which could affect responses. The robot requires specialised equipment, time, and cost, limiting routine clinical use. The study did not measure contracture clinically, so reduced final angle cannot be separated from tissue shortening. The study did not test whether KAPS detects change after anti-spasticity treatment.

Declared interests

Funding was from Ontario Research Fund - Research Excellence and Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario – Technology Development Program. The supplied text reports no author conflicts of interest. The KINARM device is made by BKIN Technologies Ltd.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude KAPS diagnoses spasticity or should replace Ashworth and Tardieu scores. It detected abnormal passive movement responses, including in people without clinical spasticity, but the study did not show that these responses change treatment decisions or patient outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →