Interventions facilitating the involvement of relatives of patients with acquired brain injury or malignant brain tumour: A scoping review.
Mette Gothardt Lundh, Sara Nordentoft, Pernille Sejr Smedegaard and 4 others
PMID 39078079WHAT IT FOUND
Relatives of stroke and brain tumour patients were involved in many varied interventions, commonly including education and physical activity or training, often delivered by nurses.
Outcomes and involvement were not measured consistently, so it cannot show which approach works.
Key findings
01Forty-six studies of interventions involving relatives of adults with acquired brain injury or malignant brain tumour were included.
02Education and physical activity or training were common intervention components, and nurses were the most frequent provider.
03No study measured the level of relatives' involvement, and the review found 35 unique outcomes and 60 unique outcome measurements.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The review did not assess the quality of the 46 included studies, so it maps what was done rather than how trustworthy the results are. Most studies were in stroke (35 studies), so findings may not transfer to relatives of patients with malignant brain tumour or other acquired brain injuries. Interventions differed widely in setting, duration, components and delivery mode, so they cannot be compared directly. No included study measured the level of relatives' involvement, so the review cannot say how much involvement was actually delivered. Many studies did not report essential characteristics, and the authors did not contact study authors for missing data. The review did not distinguish validated from unvalidated outcome measurements. The search started in 2010 and did not comprehensively search grey literature, so older or unpublished work may be missing. Scoping review methodology does not allow clinical recommendations.
Declared interests
The review was funded by Danish Health Confederation and Danish Regions (grant 2657), and the paper states the funding did not influence the review process. One author (SN) is first author of an included study but was not involved in study inclusion or data extraction for that study. The authors declared no additional conflicts.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that nurse-led education or physical activity with relatives improves caregiver burden or quality of life. This scoping review mapped 46 heterogeneous studies, did not assess study quality or estimate effects, and no study measured the level of relatives' involvement.