Intense and unpredictable perturbations during gait training improve dynamic balance abilities in chronic hemiparetic individuals: a randomized controlled pilot trial.
Vahid Esmaeili, Andréanne Juneau, Joseph-Omer Dyer and 4 others
PMID 32552850WHAT IT FOUND
Adding intense, unpredictable perturbations to treadmill walking improved dynamic balance and gait speed in people with chronic stroke.
Walking alone did not help. The perturbation group gained more balance than the control group, but the study was small and short.
Key findings
01Perturbation training significantly improved dynamic balance and walking speed in the experimental group, whereas walking-only training did not.
02Between the two groups, dynamic balance was the only outcome where the perturbation group showed a statistically significant advantage over the walking-only group.
03Participants who initially walked without perturbations and then crossed over to perturbation training showed significant improvements in balance confidence and trends toward better balance and speed.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was a small pilot trial with no prior power calculation, limiting the certainty of the findings. Fall rates were not measured, so it is unclear if the improved balance scores translate to fewer actual falls. The split-belt treadmill used to create perturbations is specialized equipment that may not be available in many clinical settings. Participants in the NonPerturb group who refused the control intervention or crossed over were not fully accounted for in the primary comparison, potentially introducing bias. The intervention involved a high number of perturbations per session, which may be difficult to replicate in busy clinical environments due to session length.
Declared interests
The study was supported by non-U.S. government funding. The authors declared no competing interests.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume this training reduces falls. The study measured balance scores and gait speed, not actual fall incidence. Additionally, the significant benefits were driven by the perturbation group's improvement; the walking-only group did not worsen, they simply did not improve, so this is an efficacy finding for a specific advanced intervention, not a replacement for standard care.