Implementation of a Loneliness Screening and Referral Program in Primary Care: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.
Chava Pollak, Jennifer Winter, Lin Drury and 4 others
PMID 40116462WHAT IT FOUND
In a 2-week primary care pilot, 50% of 102 older adults screened positive for loneliness.
Screening was feasible, but only 52% of positive-screen patients received referrals, and referral recipients did not recall or follow them.
Key findings
0150% of the 102 older adults screened positive for loneliness during the 2-week pilot.
02Of 51 patients with positive screens, 26 received community resource referrals; four providers referred to at least 50% of eligible patients.
03Interviewed patients generally did not recall receiving referral prescriptions and preferred personalized referrals.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a 2-week pilot with no control group and no patient-facing loneliness outcome, so it cannot show that screening or referral improved loneliness. Only 14 of 102 screened patients were interviewed, and 27 of 57 who agreed to contact could not be reached, so qualitative themes reflect a small and possibly unrepresentative group. Most interviews were by telephone, and providers were not interviewed, so patient views may be incomplete and staff workflow barriers were not directly assessed. The study did not collect social network size, social support, marital status, living arrangements or functional status, which may affect loneliness and referral uptake. Referral follow-through was not assessed because patients who received referrals did not recall receiving one. Three patients with dementia and one homebound patient without a telephone did not receive referrals, so the program did not test support for these groups. Screening was carried out by research staff, not routine clinic staff, so it may not transfer to usual workflow.
Declared interests
The authors disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise. The article is tagged as NIH extramural research support, but no specific funding statement is given.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the 50% positive screen as proof that the program reduced loneliness. The pilot measured implementation feasibility and acceptability, not loneliness outcomes.