PTOTOtherHong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao2019

Immediate effects of a novel walking assist device with auxiliary illuminator on patients after acute strokes.

Wan-Yun Huang, Sheng-Hui Tuan, Min-Hui Li and 2 others

PMID 31889762

WHAT IT FOUND

Adding a laser guide to a quad-cane increased the heel-strike angle in stroke patients.

This suggests better foot placement at initial contact. However, the device did not improve walking speed, stride length, or cadence in the overall group.

Key findings

01The heel-strike angle increased significantly from 0.34 degrees to 4.00 degrees when using the quad-cane with the laser illuminator.

02There were no significant changes in stride length, gait speed, cadence, or the duration of stance, swing, single-support, and double-support phases.

03In the subgroup of patients using an ankle-foot orthosis, the heel-strike angle increased and cadence decreased significantly.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study only measured immediate effects during two single walks. It did not test whether patients could learn to use the cue to improve their gait pattern over time with practice. The order of testing was fixed: standard cane first, then laser cane. This means any improvement might be due to warming up or learning the task rather than the laser itself. The sample size was small, particularly the group without ankle-foot orthoses (only 8 people), making it hard to draw firm conclusions for patients who do not use AFOs. The device measured stride length but not step length, so the researchers could not assess symmetry between the affected and unaffected legs. All participants were in the subacute or chronic stage (mean duration 33.83 months) and could already walk 20 meters, so results may not apply to acute patients or those with severe mobility limitations.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The work was supported by the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume this device improves walking speed or endurance. The study found no significant change in gait speed or stride length. The benefit was limited to the angle at which the heel strikes the ground, and it was an immediate effect from a single trial, not a proven training outcome.

Read it on PubMed →