PTOtherJournal of physical therapy science2018

Gross motor skill development of kindergarten children in Japan.

Thanda Aye, Tsugumi Kuramoto-Ahuja, Tamae Sato and 3 others

PMID 29765187

WHAT IT FOUND

Girls had higher locomotor and overall gross motor scores, while boys had higher object control scores, among 60 healthy Japanese 5-year-olds from one kindergarten.

Key findings

01Girls had higher locomotor scores than boys, including galloping, hopping, locomotor raw scores, and the Gross Motor Quotient.

02Boys had higher scores for striking, kicking, and throwing, and higher object control raw scores.

03The Gross Motor Quotient ratings were average in 25 children, above average in 22, superior in 9, very superior in 2, and below average in 2, and no child was rated poor or very poor.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was small: 60 children, and the authors state the subjects were only from one local private kindergarten school. The authors state that the children cannot represent all children in Japan. Convenience sampling was used, so participants may not represent the wider population. The study was cross-sectional and did not test an intervention, so it cannot show that any treatment changes gross motor skills. Only 5-year-old third-year kindergarten children were assessed, so the results do not describe younger or older children. All video recordings were rated by the same researcher.

Declared interests

No funding and no conflict of interest were declared.

The easy way to misread this

Do not use these scores as national norms or conclude that one sex has better overall gross motor development. The study included 60 children from one private kindergarten, and it found different patterns for locomotor and object control skills rather than a tested treatment effect.

Read it on PubMed →