OTSLPMeta-AnalysisMolecular autism2021

Fever during pregnancy as a risk factor for neurodevelopmental disorders: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Stephanie Antoun, Pierre Ellul, Hugo Peyre and 4 others

PMID 34537069

WHAT IT FOUND

Children whose mothers had a fever during pregnancy were diagnosed with a neurodevelopmental condition more often (pooled odds 1.24).

Fever in the first three months was linked; fever later on was not. Observational data, so this is an association, not proof of cause.

Key findings

01Across ten studies, fever during pregnancy was associated with higher odds of a neurodevelopmental diagnosis in the child: pooled odds ratio 1.24 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.38, p < 0.0001).

02Only fever in the first trimester was linked to neurodevelopmental diagnosis (odds ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.26, p = 0.024). Fever in the second and third trimesters was not (odds ratios 1.22, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.61, and 1.07, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.23).

03The association held separately for autism spectrum disorder (odds ratio 1.15, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.31, p = 0.03) and developmental delay (odds ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.41, p = 0.03). Odds ratios could not be calculated for ADHD (only two studies) or developmental coordination disorder (only one study).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

All ten studies were observational. They show that fever and later diagnosis go together, not that the fever caused the diagnosis; mothers who reported fever may differ from those who did not in ways the studies did not measure. Most of the participants came from two groups of mothers (the Danish National Birth Cohort and the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study), so the ten studies are less independent than they look and the results may not apply to families elsewhere. The studies disagreed with each other (I² = 61.02%), smaller studies tended to be positive (funnel plot asymmetry), and the authors' own funnel plots suggested possible publication bias for the first- and second-trimester analyses. Fever duration and antipyretic medication were each looked at in only a few studies, so the absence of an effect there may just mean too few people to detect one, as the authors themselves note. Antipyretic medication and antibiotics were combined under a single label even though they act differently, and studies of infection without recorded fever were excluded, so the effects of fever and of infection cannot be fully separated. Several secondary analyses the authors planned were never carried out because fewer than three studies reported the variable or measured it differently.

Declared interests

The paper states that the funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report, and that the corresponding author had full access to all the data and final responsibility for the decision to submit. The text supplied does not name who funded the work and gives no individual author disclosure list.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that a fever during pregnancy caused a particular child's autism, ADHD, developmental delay or coordination difficulties, or that treating a fever prevents them. The estimate comes from ten observational studies, most of the participants came from two national birth cohorts, the studies disagreed with each other, and the funnel plot suggests smaller negative studies may be missing. The authors' recommendation to treat maternal fever is not something this analysis tested.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →