OTSurveyAustralian occupational therapy journal2026

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Awareness, Knowledge, and Practice Among Australian Occupational Therapists: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Laine Chilman, Daniel Meloncelli, Alison Houghton and 2 others

PMID 42610651

WHAT IT FOUND

66.7% of these 90 Australian occupational therapists felt unprepared to raise FASD concerns with clients.

Completed FASD training and prior experience with clients were linked to confidence recognising FASD; confidence in finding reliable information was not linked to feeling prepared.

Key findings

01Occupational therapists who had completed FASD professional development were much more likely to feel confident recognising FASD: 66.7% of the 24 who had trained versus 12.1% of the 66 who had not.

02Feeling prepared to discuss FASD concerns was not significantly associated with being confident about having reliable sources of information (P = 0.211).

03Confidence was low across the sample: 30% were not confident recognising FASD and 43.3% were neutral, while 66.7% felt unprepared to discuss FASD concerns with clients.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The 90 respondents were recruited through the authors' own networks and social media, so they are unlikely to represent Australian occupational therapists as a whole. Everything measured is self-report: confidence and preparedness, not tested knowledge or observed practice. Feeling confident is not the same as being competent, and the paper did not directly measure FASD knowledge. The survey instrument was not formally validated and was piloted with only two therapists. Respondents were not asked what proportion of their caseload involved FASD, so we cannot tell how much any of this reflects day-to-day practice. The survey was open for only 8 weeks, which may have limited who took part. Client age at first contact and caseload duration were excluded from analysis because 64.4% of responses were missing, so nothing can be said about them. The design is cross-sectional: nothing here shows that training causes confidence, or that confidence changes what happens to clients. Recruitment was skewed to private practice (65.6%) with one participant from an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation, so some settings and populations are barely represented.

Declared interests

The authors declare no competing interests. The work was funded by the University of the Sunshine Coast, School of Health. Grammarly (paid version) was used to edit the manuscript's English.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the strong link between professional development and confidence as evidence that training improves practice or client outcomes. This is a one-off survey of self-reported confidence, so it cannot show that training came first, and feeling confident is not the same thing as knowing about FASD or managing it well.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →