PTRCTJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025

Feasibility and Efficacy of a Virtual Reality Social Prediction Training in Children and Young Adults with Congenital Cerebellar Malformations.

Niccolò Butti, Emilia Biffi, Romina Romaniello and 5 others

PMID 38700776

WHAT IT FOUND

VR social prediction training improved a playground-based prediction score compared with VR motor games in children and young adults with congenital cerebellar malformations, but a second action-prediction score did not improve significantly after training.

Key findings

01The experimental group had a significantly greater increase in the VR prediction score than the control group, with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.84).

02The action-prediction beta index did not show a significant between-group difference for the training effect, and the follow-up difference was only marginally significant.

03At follow-up, the experimental group showed a significantly greater increase on theory of mind than the control group.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The pandemic prevented the planned 42 participants from being reached, so the study was underpowered for some primary analyses. The assessor was not blind to group allocation. The sample was small, single-centre, and included varied cerebellar malformations and cognitive levels, so results may not apply to all patients with cerebellar malformations. The action-prediction beta index was not significant after training, and the follow-up result was marginal or exploratory. Parent-reported emotional-behavioural problems did not differ, and the parent measure was not designed to detect change in neurodevelopmental disorders. The VR-Spirit group also received motor games, so the trial tested a combined social-prediction and motor-game programme, not the social-prediction game alone.

Declared interests

The paper reports funding from Ministero della Salute and Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca. It does not report other conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the significant VR prediction score as proof that the training improves every social outcome or changes behaviour. The study did not reach its planned 42 participants, the action-prediction score was not significant after training, and parent-reported emotional-behavioural problems did not differ.

Read it on PubMed →