Factors influencing the prognosis of patients with acute cerebral infarction who received usual care: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
Hirofumi Sato, Shinsuke Okawa, Reina Kakehata and 8 others
PMID 38832215WHAT IT FOUND
In patients with acute cerebral infarction receiving usual care, poor functional outcome was predicted by higher initial stroke severity (NIHSS >4) and reinfarction, not by the timing of first mobilization.
Age and rehabilitation intensity were not independent predictors.
Key findings
01Reinfarction and initial NIHSS score were significant independent predictors of poor functional outcome at discharge.
02The timing of the first mobilization did not significantly affect functional prognosis in patients receiving usual care.
03A cutoff of 4 points on the initial NIHSS scale distinguished patients likely to have favorable outcomes.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The timing of final evaluation was not uniform between groups, with the Poor Outcome Group staying in the hospital significantly longer (30.45 days vs 21.63 days), which may have influenced functional scores at discharge. The study did not assess higher brain dysfunction or cognitive function, which are known predictors of functional outcomes. Rehabilitation intensity was measured only by the number of sessions, not by the content or quality of the exercises performed. Patients who mobilized within 48 hours were excluded, so findings do not apply to early mobilization protocols. Subtentorial lesions and patients with pre-onset dependence (mRS ≥3) were excluded, limiting generalizability to more complex or severe cases.
Declared interests
The work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 21K17499. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not interpret the lack of significance for mobilization timing as evidence that early mobilization is ineffective overall. This study only looked at patients who were already mobilized late (≥48 hours); it cannot speak to the effects of mobilizing within the first 48 hours.