OTOtherOTJR : occupation, participation and health2026

Expert Consensus on a Cognitive Rehabilitation Learning Package for Novice Occupational Therapists.

Jacqueline Wheatcroft, Natasha A Lannin, Anne M Baker and 1 others

PMID 40534536

WHAT IT FOUND

Expert occupational therapists prioritized teaching novices to interpret errors during activity analysis and modify rehabilitation plans.

They recommended video demonstrations and case studies as the best methods to build clinical reasoning for cognitive rehabilitation in hospital settings.

Key findings

01Experts ranked interpreting errors during activity analysis and modifying rehabilitation plans as the top content priorities for novice occupational therapists.

02The most highly rated teaching methods were video demonstrations of strategies and case studies showing functional impairments.

03Experts identified ten core content themes, including evidence-based theory, delivering strategies, goal setting, and understanding cognition.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Participants were recruited primarily from two Australian states where the lead author had existing professional networks, limiting geographic diversity. Expertise was self-identified, which may not reliably reflect actual clinical mastery. The study focused on clinical experts, many of whom lacked formal training in educational methods, potentially biasing the recommended teaching approaches. The 5-point Likert scale used for ranking may have lacked the granularity needed to distinguish between highly rated items.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. Funding was provided by an Australian Government Research Training Program Fee-Offset Scholarship for one author and a Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellowship for another.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret these rankings as evidence that this learning package improves patient outcomes. The study establishes expert opinion on what content should be taught, not the effectiveness of the teaching method or the package itself.

Read it on PubMed →