Evidence on the Effectiveness of Public Policies for Physical Activity Promotion in the Early Childcare Education and Care Setting: A Systematic Review.
Maike Till, Kevin Volf, Clara Tristram and 5 others
PMID 40223689WHAT IT FOUND
Requiring physical activity in childcare changed what centres offered, with 74% to 94% adherence, but did not consistently get children moving more.
Most included studies were rated only fair or poor quality.
Key findings
01Childcare centres largely reported following new physical activity policies, with adherence between 74% and 94% across the studies that measured it.
02What happened to children's actual activity was inconclusive: one study reported more moderate-to-vigorous activity in toddlers aged 19 to 35 months, while others found no change or a fall in moderate activity and total moderate-to-vigorous activity.
03Revised accreditation standards improved parts of the childcare environment, including more portable play equipment, a less sedentary environment and better staff behaviour, but the fixed play environment and staff physical activity training got worse.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only three countries were represented (the United States, Canada and Australia), so the findings may not transfer to other health systems or cultural contexts. The 11 studies used different designs and measured activity in different ways, so their results could not be combined into a single estimate. Only three studies had a control group, and those showed that changes in children's activity could not be attributed to the policy alone. Most studies were rated only fair or poor quality, which is why the authors say the results should be treated with caution. Adherence was often judged by asking centre staff, and the one study that checked both ways found staff greatly overestimated how much activity children were offered. The search ended in August 2023 and used activity-specific search terms, so relevant studies may have been missed. There is little evidence on whether these policies affect boys and girls differently or reduce inequalities.
Declared interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. No funder is named in the article.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the 74% to 94% adherence rates as evidence that children became more active. Adherence describes what centres reported offering, and in the one study that measured both ways, 78.5% of centres reported providing 30 minutes of structured activity a day while observation found 29.9%, and for 60 minutes of total activity the figures were 87.2% and 25.7%. Across the review, children's activity levels did not change consistently.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →