Establishing Therapeutic Relationships with Immigrant Families of Disabled Children: A Scoping Review.
Sarah Ninan Fenn, Stephen Isbel, Claire Pearce and 1 others
PMID 40760880WHAT IT FOUND
Therapists and immigrant families built trust through practical communication and collaboration, not through named cultural frameworks.
Bilingual staff, interpreters, home visits, cultural brokers and shared goal-setting mattered most. Most strategies were therapist-led, which can keep families cast as the 'other'.
Key findings
01The strategies that built the relationship were described independently of any cultural approach, and nine of the 24 studies named none of the reviewed approaches, using words such as culturally tailored or culturally adapted instead.
02Practitioners built rapport by simplifying grammar and vocabulary, slowing their speech, using gestures and metaphors and repeating or recasting; trained interpreters who were addressed directly and kept consistent across sessions also helped.
03Collaborative goal-setting was difficult for both sides: practitioners could not get families involved in identifying priorities, and families saw the therapist as the expert who should make the decisions and set the goals.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only English-language, peer-reviewed articles available through a university library were included, which the authors say may have excluded work from the Global South. The review did not assess the quality of the 24 included studies, and most were small qualitative studies. Nothing here tests whether any of these strategies improves care. Refugees and asylum seekers were explicitly excluded, as were studies of adults, so the findings do not speak to those families. Most of the evidence comes from high-income, English-speaking countries (11 of 24 studies from Canada), while the families described mainly came from middle- and low-income countries, so the strategies reflect practice in host countries rather than the families' own settings. The first author screened all titles and abstracts alone, although full-text screening and disagreements involved a second reviewer.
Declared interests
The authors state that they received no financial support for the research, authorship or publication of this article. No sponsor or commercial interest is declared.
The easy way to misread this
Do not take this as evidence that cultural competence or cultural sensitivity training improves care. This is a scoping review mapping what 24 mostly small qualitative studies described, it did not appraise the quality of those studies or test any strategy against an outcome, and the authors' argument that these approaches position families as the 'other' is their reading of the literature rather than a measured result.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →