OTPilotBrain injury2025

ENGAGE-TBI: adaptation of a community-based intervention to improve social participation after brain injury.

Jessica Kersey, Elnaz Alimi, Amy Roder McArthur and 4 others

PMID 39773100

WHAT IT FOUND

Adapting a community-based stroke participation programme for brain injury was feasible in a small pilot.

Participants showed improved social participation and mental health, but social isolation and physical health did not change. It cannot show the programme works.

Key findings

01Focus groups with 12 participants led to adaptations including simplified goal planning, a second peer mentor, and structured reflection time.

02The six-person pilot exceeded feasibility benchmarks and showed clinically meaningful improvements in social participation and mental health, with minimal change in social isolation and physical health.

03Feedback after the pilot led to further changes, including longer 2-hour sessions, simpler workbooks, and reflection at the start of each session.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only six people took part in the pilot, and it was a single-group pre-post study, so outcome changes cannot show the programme caused them. The protocol was changed during the study, so the results cannot be attributed to the final ENGAGE-TBI programme. Change scores varied widely across the six participants. One pilot participant did not complete additional study activities, and the authors included that person in retention but not in other feasibility analyses. The study took place at one community day programme where participants already attended regularly, so attendance and retention may not apply elsewhere. Participants knew the research team, which may have influenced their responses. People with severe communication impairment that would limit a verbal group were excluded. Fidelity to the final protocol was not tested. One peer mentor required significant ongoing support, so peer mentor selection and training are not solved by the final protocol.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the participation and mental health changes as proof that ENGAGE-TBI works. It was a six-person single-group pilot of a multi-component programme, and the protocol was still being adapted, so the authors say changes cannot be attributed to the final programme.

Read it on PubMed →