Enactive explorations of children's sensory-motor play and therapeutic handling in physical therapy.
Ragnhild B Håkstad, Gunn Kristin Øberg, Gay L Girolami and 1 others
PMID 36304785WHAT IT FOUND
Therapeutic handling helped children play and move when the therapist synchronized with the child's intentions.
When therapists led too rigidly or ignored the child's signals, play broke down and children resisted handling.
Key findings
01Handling that aligns with the child's play goals and provides dynamic support helps children discover new movements and stay engaged.
02Handling that is too intrusive or ignores the child's signals leads to conflict, disengagement, and a loss of the child's sense of agency.
03Successful interaction requires the therapist to be responsive, withdrawing support precisely when the child is ready to move independently.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This is a qualitative study of 16 sessions; it describes interactions but does not measure motor outcomes or prove that handling causes improvement. The therapists were recruited via professional networks and self-selected, so they likely already valued play-based approaches. The analysis was primarily conducted by the first author, who is also the creator of the theoretical framework used to interpret the data. Independent walkers were underrepresented in the analyzed sessions, so findings apply mostly to children with more significant motor delays. The study took place in Western contexts (Norway and US), which may not generalize to other healthcare systems.
Declared interests
The authors declare that they are all pediatric physical therapists and that the first and second authors created the theoretical concept being tested. They acknowledge a preconception that therapeutic handling is valuable, which served as the lens for the analysis. No external funding or commercial conflicts are reported in the text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not interpret this as evidence that hands-on therapy improves motor function. The study describes the nature of the interaction but did not measure whether the children's motor skills actually improved as a result of the handling.