Efficacy of different frequencies of extracorporeal shockwave on plantar flexor spasticity of the ankle in patients with stroke: a single-center, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Meihua Ke, Peike Zhou, Dongxia Li and 5 others
PMID 41913227WHAT IT FOUND
Adding shockwave therapy to standard rehab reduced calf tightness and improved ankle flexibility in stroke patients.
Both 4 Hz and 10 Hz frequencies worked, but 4 Hz showed a greater reduction in muscle stiffness after three weeks.
Key findings
01After three weeks, both shockwave groups showed improved muscle tone and ankle range of motion compared to the control group.
02The 4 Hz frequency group had a greater reduction in lateral gastrocnemius stiffness than the 10 Hz group after three weeks.
03A single session of shockwave therapy improved muscle tone and range of motion in both frequency groups compared to baseline.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study only compared the extreme ends of the common frequency range (4 Hz and 10 Hz), so the effect of intermediate frequencies is unknown. Most patients had mild spasticity (MAS Grade I), so it is unclear if the results apply to those with severe spasticity. The follow-up period was short (3 weeks), and the Modified Ashworth Scale is a subjective measure. The trial changed its secondary outcome measures after starting, dropping a daily living activities score in favor of a lower limb function score.
Declared interests
Funded by the Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen and the Shenzhen Portion of Shenzhen-Hong Kong Science and Technology Innovation Cooperation Zone. No conflicts of interest declared.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume shockwave therapy improves overall walking function or reduces clonus in this timeframe. The study found significant improvements in muscle tone and range of motion, but no significant differences in ankle clonus or lower limb motor function scores between the groups.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →