Efficacy of botulinum toxin for poststroke lower limb: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Carla Sílvia Fernandes, Andreia Maria Novo Lima, Maria Teresa Moreira and 2 others
PMID 41685871WHAT IT FOUND
Botulinum toxin injections significantly reduced lower limb spasticity in stroke survivors but did not improve walking speed or balance.
Tone reduction alone did not translate into functional gains, suggesting that injections must be paired with active rehabilitation to change how a patient moves.
Key findings
01Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant overall effect of botulinum toxin on reducing lower limb spasticity (MAS) at weeks 4 and 8, with moderate heterogeneity.
02For gait speed (10MWT) and balance (TUG), aggregated effect sizes were close to zero with no statistically significant differences between groups.
03The review included 11 studies with 1740 adults, but only 7 studies had data suitable for the meta-analysis of these specific outcomes.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The review only included 7 studies for the meta-analysis, which limits the statistical power and generalizability. There was significant heterogeneity in the studies regarding the specific muscles injected, doses used, and the baseline severity of spasticity. The strict exclusion of trials where botulinum toxin was combined with other therapies (like robotics or electrical stimulation) means the results may not reflect typical real-world practice where such combinations are common. Some included studies had limitations in blinding of participants or outcome assessors, which could introduce bias.
Declared interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
The easy way to misread this
Do not interpret the lack of functional gain as evidence that botulinum toxin is ineffective. The study tested the drug in isolation; in clinical practice, it is almost always used to enable active rehabilitation. The failure of the injection alone to improve walking does not mean the injection is useless, but rather that it is not a standalone treatment for mobility.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →