Effects of semi-independent bedside rehabilitation of the upper limb assisted with a mobile wrist-hand exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) for inpatients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Yueyan Wang, Yanhuan Huang, Yurong Mao and 4 others
PMID 42108489WHAT IT FOUND
Subacute stroke inpatients who did Bobath therapy plus bedside wrist-hand robot training improved more on the primary upper-limb motor test than those doing Bobath plus cycling robot or Bobath plus PNF, while using less therapist time.
Key findings
01On the primary FMA-UE upper-limb motor test, the bedside wrist-hand robot group had superior post-training scores and the largest change score compared with the cycling robot and conventional therapy groups.
02The wrist-hand robot group required 11.6 hours of occupational therapist involvement per participant, compared with 22.92 hours for the cycling robot group and 21.00 hours for conventional therapy.
03Finger spasticity improved more in the wrist-hand robot group, although that group had higher baseline finger spasticity than the conventional group.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The trial analysed 52 participants who completed the assigned training at one hospital. Participants and therapists were not blinded, although the outcome assessor was a physical therapist blinded to group allocation. The comparison was not a clean robot-versus-no-robot test: all groups received 30 minutes of Bobath occupational therapy daily, and the ENMS group also had a different supervision model from the fully supervised cycling robot and conventional groups. The ENMS group started with higher finger spasticity than the conventional group, so the finger spasticity result may be influenced by baseline imbalance. The study included only people who could sit for 30 minutes, had enough cognition to follow simple instructions as assessed by MMSE >23, could passively extend finger joints to 180 degrees, and had low spasticity, so it may not apply to more impaired patients. Fixed OT checkpoints at sessions 1, 6, 11, 16, and 21 may not have been enough to answer all questions during independent training.
Declared interests
Funding was provided by the Shenzhen Research and Development Program, the Innovation and technology fund of Hong Kong, and the University Grants Committee. The supplied text does not state author conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that the wrist-hand robot alone caused the better upper-limb scores. Every group received 30 minutes of Bobath occupational therapy each day, and the robot group also trained semi-independently while the other groups had continuous therapist supervision, so the robot's separate contribution cannot be isolated.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →