PTOTRCTJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2020

Effects of robot viscous forces on arm movements in chronic stroke survivors: a randomized crossover study.

Yazan Abdel Majeed, Saria Awadalla, James L Patton

PMID 33234156

WHAT IT FOUND

In 13 chronic stroke survivors, only a robot force that assisted movement made reaching faster while it was on.

Speed did not stay faster after it stopped, and resisting or rewarding speed did not increase speed.

Key findings

01A negative viscosity force that assisted movement significantly increased speed during exposure, but speed did not remain increased after the force was removed.

02Positive viscosity and breakthrough did not significantly increase speed; they had no early speed effect and no significant speed effect during washout.

03After negative viscosity was removed, movement error and movement distance showed significant improvements, and movement smoothness improved during washout.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 13 participants were analysed, and the study was not prospectively powered, so small or unstable effects are possible. One person consented but did not take part because of a second stroke, so the analysed group was smaller than the recruited group. Participants were chronic stroke survivors with Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer scores from 15 to 50 and no significant contractures or Modified Ashworth scores above 3, so findings may not apply to more impaired or spastic patients. The intervention was a single visit with 5-minute blocks, and the study did not test functional recovery or long-term training. The main speed effect was temporary; after negative viscosity was removed, speed did not stay increased. One participant initially had difficulty stopping motion under negative viscosity because of weakness, although the data were ultimately used. Crossover order effects remain possible; order was significant for retention movement error. Spasticity was not controlled for in the analysis.

Declared interests

The supplied text states that the funder was the American Heart Association. No author conflict-of-interest declaration is provided in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that robot negative viscosity improves stroke arm function or produces lasting speed gains. The speed increase was only while the force was on, and speed did not remain increased after it stopped; functional recovery was not tested.

Read it on PubMed →