Effects of hippotherapy on the thickness of deep abdominal muscles and activity of daily living in children with intellectual disabilities.
JiHyun Lee, Chang-Kyo Yun
PMID 28533630WHAT IT FOUND
Seven children with intellectual disabilities had greater transverse abdominis thickness and higher daily-living independence scores after 12 hippotherapy sessions over 6 weeks; other abdominal muscles did not change.
Key findings
01The right transverse abdominis thickness increased from 2.19 ± 0.32 mm to 2.50 ± 2.41 mm, and this change was reported as significant (p<0.05).
02The external oblique and internal oblique thickness did not change significantly (p>0.05).
03FIM scores increased from 95.71 ± 11.50 to 101.00 ± 10.68, and this change was reported as significant (p<0.05).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only seven children were studied, and the authors noted that the small sample size and short period make generalisation difficult. There was no control group, random allocation, or comparison condition, so the changes cannot be separated from natural development, practice effects, or other influences. The follow-up was only 6 weeks, so long-term effects are unknown. Participants had mild intellectual disability, could sit alone, and had no visual or auditory impairments, so the results may not apply to more impaired children. The authors noted uncontrolled variation in hippotherapy, including walking speed, road surface, and horse differences. Muscle thickness was measured only on the right, and the paper does not report whether the ultrasound assessor or the FIM evaluators were blinded.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the transverse abdominis and FIM changes as proof that hippotherapy improves these outcomes in children with intellectual disabilities. Seven children were studied without a control group, and the paper cannot separate the intervention from natural development, practice effects, or other influences.