Effectiveness of simple and basic home-based exercise programs including pediatric massage executed by caregivers at their homes in the management of children with spastic cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial.
Qamar Mahmood, Shaista Habibullah, Hazrat Ullah Aurakzai
PMID 38427509WHAT IT FOUND
Adding pediatric massage to a home exercise programme did not improve gross motor function more than the exercises alone; both groups of children with spastic diplegia improved over 12 weeks.
Massage reduced spasticity a little more than exercise alone.
Key findings
01Gross motor function improved in both groups over the 12 weeks, but the children who also received pediatric massage did not improve significantly more than those who did the exercises alone.
02Spasticity averaged across all four limbs fell in both groups and fell significantly further in the massage group than in the exercise-only group, at six weeks (p = 0.049) and at 12 weeks (p = 0.019).
03Every child in the trial did the home exercise programme; the massage was given before those exercises on top of them, so the study cannot show what either treatment does on its own or against no treatment.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Caregivers carried out all the treatment at home, so the researchers could not check how much, how often or how well it was actually done, or whether the two groups did it equally. Both groups did the home exercise programme and there was no untreated comparison group, so the improvement seen in both groups cannot be attributed to the programme alone; children of this age may change over 12 weeks anyway. Only 63 children at a single centre, recruited by purposive sampling rather than randomly from a defined population. Children were 4 to 12 years old, so the results do not apply outside that age range. The spasticity advantage for massage was borderline at six weeks (p = 0.049) and rests on an average across four limbs, so it is a small difference on a coarse scale. The paper describes blinding of the outcome assessors only; the families knew which treatment they were giving. Sixty-eight children were recruited to detect a moderate effect, which is a small number for detecting anything smaller.
Declared interests
The paper does not say who funded the study, and it reports no competing interests. It states that the trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05111236).
The easy way to misread this
Do not take this trial as proof that pediatric massage improves movement in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Every child did the home exercise programme, and the massage group's gross motor scores were no better than the exercise-only group's at six or twelve weeks. The only between-group difference was in spasticity, and at six weeks that was borderline (p = 0.049).
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →