PTOTRCTOccupational therapy international2022

Effectiveness of Repetitive Facilitative Exercise Combined with Electrical Stimulation Therapy to Improve Very Severe Paretic Upper Limbs in with Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hitoshi Ohnishi, Hiroyuki Miyasaka, Naoki Shindo and 3 others

PMID 35572164

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients with very severe arm paralysis who combined repetitive exercise with electrical stimulation showed greater gains in hand and finger function than those receiving conventional therapy alone.

No other treatment group improved significantly more than the control, and proximal shoulder function did not differ between groups.

Key findings

01The group receiving repetitive facilitative exercise while undergoing electrical stimulation had significantly higher gains in Fugl-Meyer Assessment wrist and finger items compared to the conventional therapy group.

02Total upper limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment gains were significantly larger in the combined exercise and stimulation group compared to the conventional therapy group.

03There were no significant differences in gains for the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set Knee-Mouth or Finger-Function tests among the four groups.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study focused on patients with very severe paralysis (median FMA score of 4 at baseline), so the results may not apply to those with moderate or mild weakness. The number of movement repetitions in the RFE groups was not strictly controlled, which introduces variability in the dose of exercise received. The total intervention time was 560 minutes, which was less than in previous studies showing larger effects, potentially underestimating the potential benefit of longer-duration training. The study was single-center and single-blind (only the evaluator was blinded), which may introduce bias in treatment delivery or patient expectations.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was approved by the ethical committee of Fujita Health University.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that electrical stimulation or repetitive exercise alone is superior to conventional therapy. The study found significant benefits only for the group that combined both techniques; the groups receiving either RFE or NMES alone did not show significantly greater improvement than the conventional therapy group in the primary distal outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →