Effectiveness of a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality-based intervention on upper limb function in chronic individuals post-stroke with persistent severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial.
Roberto Llorens, María Antonia Fuentes, Adrián Borrego and 4 others
PMID 34210347WHAT IT FOUND
In chronic severe stroke hemiparesis, tDCS plus a self-triggered VR task followed by conventional physical therapy improved arm motor scores more than conventional physical therapy alone; sensory scores did not differ.
Single components cannot be separated.
Key findings
01The primary upper-limb motor outcome, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale, improved more in the combined group than in the conventional therapy group.
02The combined group's Fugl-Meyer improvement was 5.3 ± 4.1 and exceeded the paper's stated clinical importance threshold.
03Sensory function did not differ between groups on the Nottingham Sensory Assessment total score or its tactile, kinesthetic, or stereognosis subscales.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 29 participants were analysed, after one control participant attended only one session and two experimental participants dropped out. The trial was registered retrospectively, after the study period. The experimental group received tDCS and a VR task plus conventional physical therapy, and no sham tDCS or placebo VR was used, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The supervising physical therapist was not blinded, although the outcome assessor was blinded. The trial measured outcomes only before and after the intervention, so it does not show whether motor gains persisted. The study had no structural or functional data on corticospinal tract integrity, so it cannot explain why four participants did not improve. The Wolf Motor Function Test gains had poor effect sizes, so those secondary motor activity findings were weaker than the primary Fugl-Meyer result.
Declared interests
Funded by Conselleria d'Educació, Investigació, Cultura i Esport, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, and Universitat Politècnica de València (ES). The supplied text lists these funders and does not state author conflicts.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that tDCS or VR alone caused the motor gains. The experimental group also received conventional physical therapy, and no sham tDCS or placebo VR was used, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated.