OTRCTChild: care, health and development2025

Effect of Telerehabilitation on Handwriting Performance in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Büşra Kaplan Kılıç, Gonca Bumin, Hakan Öğütlü

PMID 39980280

WHAT IT FOUND

Eight weeks of online, therapist-led fine motor training improved handwriting and fine motor scores in 6-8 year olds with inattentive-type ADHD, with mothers helping at home.

Writing rate did not improve. All 35 children finished the programme.

Key findings

01The primary outcome, fine motor skill measured on the BOT-2, improved in the group that received the online programme while the waitlist group's scores stayed essentially unchanged, with strong effect sizes across fine motor precision, fine motor integration, manual dexterity, bilateral coordination and upper-limb coordination.

02Handwriting, the secondary outcome, also improved: legibility, form, alignment, size and spacing all improved in the intervention group, but writing rate did not. Effect sizes were strong in those five areas and moderate for rate.

03Every session was run online by an occupational therapist with the mother sitting alongside the child and carrying out the therapist's instructions, and the authors state that without the mothers' support the results might not have been as effective, suggesting future studies compare the programme with and without that support.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

No follow-up after the programme ended, so nothing here shows whether the handwriting gains lasted. The control group was a waitlist receiving only their usual medication. No children were having face-to-face occupational therapy, so the trial cannot say whether online delivery matches or beats in-person treatment. The programme depended on a mother being present and hands-on for all 24 sessions. The authors themselves note the results might not have been as good without that support. Handwriting difficulty was accepted on the parents' word alone; no handwriting measure was used to decide who got in, which the authors say would have made the method stronger. Several outcome variables broke the assumption of equal variance-covariance matrices (Box's M test p < 0.01), which the authors say may limit how far the results generalise. Only the inattentive subtype of ADHD was studied, only children aged 6 to 8, and all were already on stable medication, so the findings do not automatically carry over to other subtypes, older children or children not on medication. Single centre in Turkey, and the children were already reported by their families to have handwriting problems, so all were motivated to take part.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Ethics approval came from Ankara City Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee and the trial was registered (NCT04697771). No funding source is named in the text supplied.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as evidence that online therapy works as well as face-to-face therapy. The comparison group received nothing but their usual medication, with no follow-up afterwards, so the trial only shows the online programme beat a waitlist. Do not assume the fine motor training alone did the work, either. A mother sat beside each child for all 24 sessions carrying out the therapist's instructions, and the authors say the results might not have been as effective without that support.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →