OTSLPRCTDysphagia2025

Effect of Oral Neuromuscular Training on Tracheostomy Decannulation and Swallowing Function in Patients with Severe Acquired Brain Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Melanie Blichfeldt, Mohit Kothari, Jesper Fabricius

PMID 40387911

WHAT IT FOUND

No clear difference in time to decannulation when IQoro was added to usual care for tracheostomized patients with severe acquired brain injury.

Usual care alone improved swallowing scores more, and one residue measure favoured usual care.

Key findings

01The primary outcome, time to decannulation, was not statistically significant, despite a hazard ratio of 1.40 favouring IQoro.

02Usual care alone improved FEES swallowing scores significantly on all scales, while IQoro improved significantly only on FEDSS.

03The usual care group had significantly better pyriform sinus residue than the IQoro group, but this may be chance due to the small number of participants.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was a pilot with only 22 enrolled and 20 completed, so chance findings are likely. The primary outcome was not statistically significant, so the hazard ratio favouring IQoro should not be read as proof of benefit. Decannulation and swallowing assessment were not done by blinded assessors. Participants had severe acquired brain injury and low consciousness, so results may not apply to less severe acquired brain injury or non-tracheostomized patients. The power calculation was based on a previous study that may have bias, and that study's usual care was not described in detail. Treatment fidelity was affected by participants sleeping, agitated behaviour, and leaving the ward; adherence was a median of 82%. Baseline pharyngeal residue was borderline higher in the usual care group, which may affect residue findings.

Declared interests

Funding was named as Regional hospital central Jutland Research Foundation and Aarhus Universitet.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the trend toward faster decannulation as proof that IQoro works. The primary outcome was not statistically significant. Do not treat the worse residue finding as proven harm. It may be a chance finding because the study was small.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →