RNOtherApplied nursing research : ANR2016

Effect of nocturia on next-day sedentary activity in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Jonna L Morris, Susan M Sereika, Martin Houze and 1 others

PMID 27969050

WHAT IT FOUND

Two or more nighttime voids were associated with more next-day sedentary time in adults with type 2 diabetes (76.4% versus 73.13% of waking time), but did not predict subjective fatigue.

Key findings

01Voiding two or more times per night was independently associated with more next-day sedentary time: 76.4% versus 73.13% of waking time.

02Perceived nightly sleep quality and sleep duration were independently associated with next-day subjective physical and mental energy.

03High and low nocturia groups did not differ significantly in daytime sleepiness, global sleep quality, A1C, BMI, or marital status.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was cross-sectional, so it cannot show that nocturia caused more sedentary time. The sample was modest and not based on a power analysis, so null findings may be false negatives. Causes of nighttime voiding, such as diuretic medications, fluid intake, glycosuria, bladder disorders, or sleep apnea severity, were not evaluated. Participants were ambulatory, could read and write English, and were screened for a CPAP trial, so results may not apply to all adults with type 2 diabetes. Nocturia, sleep quality, and energy were self-reported, while sedentary time was measured by armband.

Declared interests

Funding was from the National Institutes of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute grant HL089522 and grants UL1 RR024153 and UL1TR000005. No other conflicts are listed in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that treating nocturia will reduce sedentary time or improve diabetes control. The association is observational, the study did not test an intervention, and causes of nighttime voiding were not evaluated.

Read it on PubMed →