PTOTRCTJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2017

Effect of EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation with bilateral arm training on hemiplegic shoulder pain and arm function after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Li-Ling Chuang, You-Lin Chen, Chih-Chung Chen and 4 others

PMID 29183339

WHAT IT FOUND

Pain at rest did not differ between groups, but EMG-triggered NMES plus bilateral arm training reduced pain during shoulder movement and worst pain more than TENS plus the same training, with benefit still seen at follow-up.

Key findings

01Pain at rest improved in both groups, but the groups did not differ and their changes over time did not differ.

02EMG-triggered NMES plus bilateral arm training produced lower pain during active and passive shoulder movement than TENS plus bilateral arm training at follow-up, and the EMG group maintained pain reduction during passive movement while the TENS group increased at follow-up.

03The EMG-triggered NMES plus bilateral arm training group had greater reductions in worst pain, with scores from 5.95 to 2.58 and 2.11, versus 5.21 to 3.95 and 4.05 for the TENS plus bilateral arm training group, and the paper reported between-group differences at post-treatment and follow-up.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The trial had no placebo stimulation control and only a 1-month follow-up, so longer-term effects and nonspecific effects remain uncertain. Both groups received bilateral arm training, and the study did not compare EMG-triggered NMES alone, TENS alone, or bilateral arm training alone, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. Participants were at least 3 months after stroke, and mean time since stroke was 31.89 months in the EMG group and 33.47 months in the TENS group, so findings may not apply to acute stroke. Aphasia and severe cognitive deficits were excluded, and participants needed Mini-Mental State Examination score at least 24, so results may not apply to people with communication or cognitive impairment. The analysis included 38 participants, and subgroup analyses by shoulder subluxation used smaller numbers, such as 9 with subluxation in the EMG group and 8 in the TENS group, so subgroup conclusions are limited. The paper reports significant differences for pain during movement and worst pain, but not for pain at rest or pain interference, so the positive results are outcome-specific.

Declared interests

Funded by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou; and Healthy Aging Research Center at Chang Gung University. The supplied text does not state other author conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that EMG-triggered NMES alone is the active treatment. Both groups received bilateral arm training, and the trial did not compare stimulation with bilateral arm training alone, so it cannot show how much of the benefit came from the stimulation or the training.

Read it on PubMed →