Effect of education based on the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation on blood pressure and self-management of hypertensive patients: A clinical trial study.
Zohre Kordvarkane, Khodayar Oshvandi, Younes Mohammadi and 1 others
PMID 37545783WHAT IT FOUND
Hypertensive patients who received five face-to-face education sessions based on the Common-Sense Model plus phone follow-up had lower systolic blood pressure and higher self-management scores than controls who received brief clinic advice.
The effect was large enough to move the intervention group's mean systolic pressure from the prehypertensive range into the normal range.
Key findings
01After three months, the intervention group's mean systolic blood pressure was 116.21 mmHg versus 128.62 mmHg in controls, a statistically significant difference.
02Total self-management scores rose from 122.06 to 165.06 in the intervention group while controls stayed near baseline at 128.25, with significant gains across all five subscales.
03The control group showed no significant change in any blood pressure measure or self-management dimension over the study period.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Participants were limited to literate adults aged 40 to 65, so results may not apply to older patients, those with low literacy, or younger adults. Self-management was measured by self-report, which can be inflated by patients who know the study aims. The intervention was delivered by the study's main researcher, so it is unclear whether routine clinic nurses could replicate the effect without extensive training. Individual sessions were used because of the pandemic; the authors note group training might be more time-efficient but was not tested here. The paper does not report whether allocation concealment was maintained beyond the randomisation list, and blinding of participants was not possible. The intervention included both structured education and regular phone contact, so the relative contribution of each component cannot be separated.
Declared interests
Funded by the vice-chancellor for research and technology at Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. The authors declare no competing interests.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume the effect came from the Common-Sense Model content alone. The intervention group also received five face-to-face sessions plus a 10-minute phone call every three days, while controls received only a brief pamphlet and a short nurse chat at visits. The extra time, attention, and accountability from regular calls may account for much of the benefit, and the study cannot separate the model's specific techniques from this general dose of contact.