RNMeta-AnalysisPatient education and counseling2020

Effect of diabetes self-management education on glycemic control in Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Janett A Hildebrand, John Billimek, Jung-Ah Lee and 4 others

PMID 31542186

WHAT IT FOUND

In Latino adults with type 2 diabetes, self-management education lowered A1C by 0.240% compared with usual care.

Most participants did not reach target levels.

Key findings

01Self-management education reduced A1C by 0.240% in the pooled analysis of 18 RCTs.

02Greater pooled A1C reductions were reported in studies lasting 6 months or less and in studies starting with A1C above 8.5%.

03Most participants did not achieve A1C target levels despite the average reduction.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The meta-analysis included only 18 randomized controlled trials, so the subgroup findings rest on small numbers of studies. Blinding of participants and personnel was difficult because the intervention was education, and only some studies blinded providers or outcome assessors. Five studies used enhanced care for control groups, which may have reduced the apparent difference between groups. Attrition rates varied from 6% to over 40%, and common reasons for dropping out were transportation, child care, time, illness or lack of interest. Moderate heterogeneity meant studies varied in participants, curriculum, duration and baseline A1C, so one DSME format cannot be inferred. Only published, peer-reviewed studies were searched, so unpublished work may be missing. The time between the end of the intervention and A1C measurement varied across studies.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that diabetes self-management education will usually bring Latino adults with type 2 diabetes to A1C target levels. The pooled reduction was 0.240%, and most participants did not reach target levels.

Read it on PubMed →