PTOTRCTJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Effect of an exosuit on daily life gait performance in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial.

L Visch, B E Groen, A C H Geurts and 2 others

PMID 41826999

WHAT IT FOUND

A home-based exosuit program did not increase daily walking time over six weeks compared with a conventional training program.

Usability and satisfaction were marginal, so routine prescription of this exosuit to improve daily walking is not supported.

Key findings

01Daily walking time during the home period did not differ significantly between groups after baseline adjustment (p = 0.23; mean difference 9 min, Wald confidence interval -6 to 25).

02No significant group differences were found in gait capacity measures post-intervention after baseline adjustment.

03Intervention-group participants reported marginal usability, with D-SUS averages of 64 and 56, and ease of use and comfort were important items with dissatisfied counts of 11, 12, and 13.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The trial was open-label: participants and treating physical therapists knew which program they received, and the outcome assessor was not blinded. It was conducted at one centre, and participants had to be able to walk 10 m and don the device or have a caregiver, so results may not apply to people with more severe walking limitation. The trial compared whole programs, so the effect of the exosuit alone cannot be separated from training, device-learning time, and usual care. Primary walking-time data were incomplete for some assessments; days were averaged from available complete days rather than always seven full days. Missing data were handled by using the last available measurement, which can bias repeated daily walking estimates. Two intervention-group participants stopped because of pain, and device errors interrupted use, so the null result may reflect poor usability or reliability rather than a pure lack of effect. Home use was recorded in logbooks rather than device data, and participants may have been selected for technology interest. The population was heterogeneous, and secondary analyses did not identify characteristics that predicted response. Cost and quality-of-life comparisons were descriptive and not powered for statistical comparison.

Declared interests

ZonMw is named as funder.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the exosuit alone caused no benefit. Both groups received physical-therapist training and usual care, and the Myosuit group also learned device operation, so the trial compares whole programs, not the exosuit in isolation. Intervention-group participants used the Myosuit 2.7 times per week on average and reported marginal usability.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →