Early Use of Phenol Neurolysis Likely Reduces the Total Amount of Botulinum Toxin in Management of Post-Stroke Spasticity.
Sheng Li, Jean Woo, Manuel F Mas
PMID 36188807WHAT IT FOUND
Stroke patients who received phenol neurolysis first required significantly less botulinum toxin in their subsequent injections compared to those who received botulinum toxin first.
Phenol was typically used for lower limb spasticity within four months of stroke onset.
Key findings
01Patients who received phenol neurolysis first required a significantly lower total dose of botulinum toxin in their subsequent injections compared to those who received botulinum toxin first.
02Phenol neurolysis was commonly targeted at proximal muscles and nerves of the lower extremities, with the tibial and sciatic nerves being the most frequently injected sites.
03No side effects were reported after early phenol or botulinum toxin injections in this chart review, though minor side effects may have been undocumented.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This is a retrospective chart review, so it cannot prove that phenol caused the reduction in BoNT dose; it only shows an association. The study did not use clinical scales like the Modified Ashworth Scale to measure spasticity directly, so it is unclear if the lower BoNT dose reflected better spasticity control or simply different treatment patterns. Side effects may have been underestimated because minor issues are often not documented in medical charts. The study population was limited to patients admitted to a single inpatient rehabilitation facility, which may not reflect broader practice. The decision to use phenol or BoNT was based on clinical judgment and consensus, not randomization, introducing potential selection bias. The study did not assess long-term motor recovery or functional outcomes, so it is unknown if the reduced BoNT dose affected the patient's overall rehabilitation progress.
Declared interests
One author (SL) is a consultant for SAOL Therapeutics for the research protocol development of a new phenol. The authors declare no other commercial or financial relationships.
The easy way to misread this
Do not interpret the lower botulinum toxin dose in the Phenol-First group as proof that phenol is more effective at reducing spasticity. The study did not measure spasticity directly using clinical scales, so the lower dose could reflect different treatment targets or clinical judgment rather than superior efficacy.