OTCohortJournal of autism and developmental disorders2020

Early Motor Differences in Infants at Elevated Likelihood of Autism Spectrum Disorder and/or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Jannath Begum Ali, Tony Charman, Mark H Johnson and 1 others

PMID 32328858

WHAT IT FOUND

At 10 months, infants with a family history of autism or ADHD crossed the body midline less often during block play than typical infants.

The difference was not seen at 5 or 14 months, and it was not accompanied by differences in motor scores.

Key findings

01At 10 months, typical-likelihood infants made more manual actions that crossed the body midline than infants with elevated likelihood of ASD or ADHD; the ASD-plus-ADHD comparison did not survive correction.

02The midline-crossing difference was not due to a general motor delay: at 10 months, gross and fine motor scores did not differ significantly between typical-likelihood and elevated-likelihood groups.

03Among elevated-likelihood infants, more midline crossings at 10 months were associated with greater parent-reported ADHD traits at 24 months, but not with ASD traits.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The infants were selected for family history, not for a confirmed ASD or ADHD diagnosis in the child, and the study did not make clinical determinations at 2 years. ADHD elevated likelihood was partly defined by parent-reported concerns and screening questionnaires, not only by clinical diagnosis. The key group difference appeared only at 10 months; it was not seen at 5 or 14 months, so it may be a narrow developmental observation. Several group comparisons did not survive correction for multiple testing, including the ASD-plus-ADHD group for total contralateral behaviours and object manipulations. The association with ADHD traits was based on parent report at 24 months and does not show that midline crossing predicts later diagnosed ADHD. Coding was done by one researcher, with 12% double coded, and task length varied slightly, so behaviours were converted to rates per minute. The Mullen scores may not match broader field norms because the team used stricter scoring than is common.

Declared interests

The supplied article lists funding from the Medical Research Council, MQ and the Innovative Medicines Initiative. It gives no author conflict-of-interest statement.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat reduced midline crossing at 10 months as a clinical sign of autism or ADHD. The children had no diagnosis at 2 years, the difference was not seen at 5 or 14 months, and the later association was with parent-reported ADHD traits rather than confirmed disorder.

Read it on PubMed →