PTOTCohortClinical rehabilitation2019

Does pre-existing cognitive impairment impact on amount of stroke rehabilitation received? An observational cohort study.

Verity Longley, Sarah Peters, Caroline Swarbrick and 2 others

PMID 31020850

WHAT IT FOUND

Stroke inpatients with documented pre-existing cognitive impairment received fewer physiotherapy and occupational therapy sessions: 16 fewer on average, but 9 fewer after accounting for age, sex, stroke severity and pre-stroke disability.

Key findings

01Stroke inpatients with documented pre-existing cognitive impairment received 16 fewer total physiotherapy and occupational therapy sessions over eight weeks than those without.

02The difference was 14 fewer sessions after accounting for age, sex and stroke severity, and 9 fewer when pre-stroke disability was also accounted for.

03Of 85 discharged by eight weeks, 47 (75%) without pre-existing cognitive impairment were referred to early supported discharge, compared with 8 (42%) with pre-existing cognitive impairment.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was observational and did not assign treatment, so it cannot show that cognitive impairment caused less therapy. 52 patients were not approached because no consultee was available or the clinical team advised against it, and 25 consenting participants came from a site without complete screening data, so the sample may miss people with cognitive impairment. Only 9 participants had diagnosed dementia, so dementia and undiagnosed cognitive impairment were combined; the study cannot separate their effects. Therapy sessions were counted from clinical notes, so some therapy may not have been documented, and data extraction was not blind to cognitive status. Pre-existing cognitive impairment was identified from documentation, often family social history, and not all participants had routine cognitive screening, so some impairment may have been missed. The difference became smaller after accounting for pre-stroke disability, and that measure may be confounded because cognitive impairment can affect disability scores. The study only included patients already admitted to rehabilitation, so it cannot describe differences for patients who were never referred or admitted. No post-stroke outcome measures were collected, so the study cannot show whether less therapy affected recovery.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Greater Manchester in partnership with the Stroke Association, and one author was partially funded by the Stroke Association and that collaboration. The views expressed were the authors' and not necessarily those of the funders.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the 16 fewer sessions as proof that cognitive impairment caused unequal care. The study was observational, therapy was counted from notes, and the difference became 9 fewer after accounting for age, sex, stroke severity and pre-stroke disability.

Read it on PubMed →