Do emotional distress and functional problems in persons with traumatic brain injury contribute to perceived sleep-related impairment in caregivers?
Anna L Kratz, Nicholas R Boileau, Angelle M Sander and 5 others
PMID 32406737WHAT IT FOUND
Caregivers of service members and veterans with traumatic brain injury reported more sleep impairment than civilian caregivers.
In civilian dyads, patient thinking and arm function were linked to caregiver sleep impairment; in military dyads, patient anger was linked.
Key findings
01Caregivers of service members and veterans reported sleep-related impairment averaging 65.3, compared with 50.6 for civilian caregivers, on a scale where 50 is the reference mean and higher scores mean more distress.
02In civilian dyads, functional status accounted for moderate increases of 20 to 28% of the variance in caregiver sleep-related impairment, while emotional distress accounted for small, non-significant changes. Cognitive functioning showed a large independent effect and upper-extremity functioning showed a moderate independent effect.
03In service member and veteran dyads, emotional distress added 24% of the variance when entered in Step 3, while functional status added very small changes of 0 to 10%. Anger showed a moderate independent effect.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 52 dyads were analysed, and the civilian and service member/veteran subsamples were too small for detailed group-specific models. The study was cross-sectional, so it cannot show that patient problems caused caregiver sleep problems. Caregiver sleep was measured only by self-report, with no objective sleep test such as polysomnography or actigraphy. Sleep was not assessed in the person with TBI, even though caregiver and care recipient sleep may affect each other. The within-group regression findings were post hoc and relied on effect sizes rather than statistical significance. The civilian and service member/veteran groups differed in caregiver age, gender, and relationship to the care recipient. This makes it hard to know why the patterns differed. Injury severity was poorly documented for the service member/veteran group, and inclusion criteria differed between groups. The sample was mostly White and female, so results may not apply to other caregivers. The study did not measure caregiver emotional distress, caregiver functional status, or whether the dyad slept in the same room.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that a patient’s anger, thinking, or arm function causes caregiver sleep impairment. These were cross-sectional associations in a small sample, and the within-group analyses were post hoc with effect sizes prioritized over statistical significance.