Developmental Screening in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: Disease-Related Risk and Screening Outcomes in 4 Year Olds.
Jeffrey Schatz, Alyssa Schlenz, Laura Reinman and 2 others
PMID 28816916WHAT IT FOUND
In 77 four-year-olds, higher-risk sickle cell genotypes had lower language scores and more positive screens.
Among higher-risk children, those with abnormal stroke-risk tests also had lower language scores and more positive screens.
Key findings
01Children with higher-risk sickle cell genotypes scored lower on syntax, and ASQ-2 screening results flagged concern more often, mainly in Fine Motor.
02Abnormal transcranial Doppler exams were associated with lower syntax scores; children with abnormal exams averaged 76.0, compared with 89.8 for children with normal or conditional exams.
03ASQ-2 overall screening results flagged concern in all 5 children with abnormal transcranial Doppler exams, compared with 22 of 47 children with normal or conditional exams.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a single hematology clinic with psychology staff and convenient clinic space, so results may not apply to other settings. Only 77 children were analysed, and only 5 had abnormal transcranial Doppler exams, so the stroke-risk associations are based on a very small subgroup. The study did not compare screening results with a full developmental assessment, so false positive and false negative rates are unknown. Sleep apnea data were not collected systematically, so null findings for sleep apnea are limited. Parents knew their child's medical history when completing the ASQ-2, which could have influenced their ratings. Social and environmental factors that affect development were not measured, and insurance status was only a dichotomous proxy for socioeconomic status. Children who completed only one screening instrument were excluded, and reasons for refusal were not collected systematically. The age effect on syntax scores may reflect test-taking ability or fatigue rather than development.
Declared interests
For the remaining authors, no conflicts of interest were declared. The supplied text does not report a funder.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read these screening results as proof that either test diagnoses developmental disorders or that screening improves outcomes. The study did not compare screenings with a full developmental assessment, and the abnormal transcranial Doppler finding came from only 5 children.