PTOTOtherArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2023

Development of a Short Form Assessment Combining the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity and the Wolf Motor Function Test for Evaluating Stroke Recovery.

Michelle Woodbury, Emily S Grattan, Chih-Ying Li

PMID 37245692

WHAT IT FOUND

A new 15-item upper extremity assessment combines items from two common stroke tests.

It measures a single construct of functional capacity and can distinguish five different levels of recovery. It is not yet proven to track change over time or work well for severe impairment.

Key findings

01The 15-item short form combines items from the FMA-UE and WMFT to measure a single construct of upper extremity functional capacity.

02The short form is reliable and can differentiate between five distinct levels of stroke recovery in the studied sample.

03Items from both original assessments were interspersed across the difficulty scale, ranging from easy tasks like cylindrical grasp to hard tasks like pronation/supination.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study did not include people with severe stroke or severe spasticity, so the tool may not be appropriate for those patients. Responsiveness to change was not tested, meaning it is unknown if the tool can accurately measure improvement after therapy. The study was a secondary analysis of existing data, not a new trial of the tool's implementation. The clinical meaning of the 'five recovery levels' identified by the tool is not yet defined by standard stroke severity categories.

Declared interests

None declared.

The easy way to misread this

Do not use this short form to measure patient progress or treatment effectiveness yet. The study only validated its internal structure and reliability at a single time point, not its ability to detect change over time.

Read it on PubMed →