SLPOtherJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2025

Delineating Effects of Stress-Analogous, Low-Dose Cortisol Exposure on Human Vocal Fold Fibroblasts.

Anumitha Venkatraman, Wen-Hsuan Tseng, Susan Thibeault

PMID 40653410

WHAT IT FOUND

In lab-grown human vocal fold cells, stress-level cortisol exposure for one week altered gene activity, increasing fibrosis markers and glucocorticoid signaling while reducing inflammation.

When combined with bacterial toxins, inflammation increased. These are cellular mechanisms, not clinical patient outcomes.

Key findings

01Stress-analogous cortisol exposure upregulated pro-fibrotic gene expression (ACTA2) and glucocorticoid signaling molecules (GILZ) in healthy human vocal fold fibroblasts.

02In cells exposed to both cortisol and inflammatory stimuli, inflammatory gene expression (IL1-β) was upregulated, and protein expression of α-SMA was observed.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was conducted entirely in vitro using an immortalized cell line, not in living human subjects. The cortisol dose (100 nM) was fixed to simulate stress, but natural cortisol levels vary throughout the day and between individuals. The study used a small number of replicates (N=3 per group). The findings describe gene and protein expression changes in cells, which do not directly translate to measurable voice outcomes or clinical symptoms in patients.

Declared interests

The authors declare no known competing financial interests or personal relationships.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret these cellular changes as proof that psychosocial stress causes vocal fold fibrosis or voice disorders in patients. This is an in vitro study of isolated cells, and the biological mechanisms observed here have not been tested for their effect on actual human voice function or clinical outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →