PTOTSLPSurveyFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025

Defining the key elements of the Affolter Model® in a multiprofessional Delphi study: a first step toward evidence-based Tactual Interaction Therapy.

Tamarith Schlunegger, Sabine Augstein, Laurent Munch and 2 others

PMID 41140520

WHAT IT FOUND

Experienced Affolter Model practitioners agreed on 32 statements describing its concept, principles, methods and techniques.

They did not test whether Tactual Interaction Therapy works; the result is a consensus map for future research and teaching.

Key findings

01The Delphi process reached consensus on 32 of 38 statements describing the Affolter Model's concept, principles, methods and techniques.

02The agreed content centres on non-verbal tactile guiding through meaningful everyday activities, with verbalisation after guiding.

03Statements K9 and P12 did not reach consensus, and the paper notes that stress and learning are difficult terms to define.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The expert panel was restricted to certified or licensed Affolter Model practitioners with at least five years of practical application, so the result reflects one association, not all users of the model. The survey was available only in German and French, and most participants were from Switzerland and Germany, so other countries and languages may not be represented. The sample was small for profession-specific analysis, with 15 occupational therapists, 6 speech therapists, 5 physical therapists and 5 curative educators among 40 participants. The initial statements were written by the project group before the panel voted, and the project group also revised wording, so consensus may have been shaped by that group. The study used mean values from an ordinal Likert scale, which the authors note is controversial, and individual feedback may have anchored later responses. No patients were treated or assessed, so the study cannot show that Tactual Interaction Therapy improves function, participation, language, movement or daily activities.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the agreed statements as proof that Tactual Interaction Therapy improves patient outcomes. The study asked experts to define the Affolter Model, and it did not recruit patients or measure treatment effects.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →