RNRCTPatient education and counseling2017

Decision-making and goal-setting in chronic disease management: Baseline findings of a randomized controlled trial.

Shreya Kangovi, Nandita Mitra, Robyn A Smith and 6 others

PMID 27717532

WHAT IT FOUND

Low-income patients with several chronic diseases often chose the condition in poorer control, set goals for weight, blood sugar and blood pressure, and made action plans about behavior and coping more than medical navigation.

Key findings

01Patients who chose diabetes had a mean HbA1C of 8.9%, compared with 7.0 for other diabetic patients, and patients who chose hypertension had a baseline systolic blood pressure of 143.8 mmHg, compared with 129.6 for other hypertensive patients.

02The average goals were a weight loss of 16.8 pounds, an HbA1C reduction of 1.3%, and a blood pressure reduction of 9.8 mmHg.

03Action plans were most commonly about health behavior change (58.9%) and psychosocial issues (23.5%), with fewer about health system navigation (8.5%), resources for daily life (8.0%), and medical issues (1.2%).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a baseline report, not a trial result on goal attainment or health outcomes. The trial compares collaborative goal-setting alone with collaborative goal-setting plus community health worker support, and has no placebo control arm, so it cannot show whether collaborative goal-setting works better than usual care. Participants were recruited from urban academic internal medicine clinics serving a high-poverty area, and were mostly low-income patients with multiple chronic conditions, so findings may not apply to other populations. Patients focusing on tobacco were asked to set complete cessation goals, which may have discouraged some heavy smokers. Action plans were shaped by the decision aid and community health worker prompts, so they may not reflect completely patient-driven planning. Goal-setting occurred during routine primary care visits with no extra dedicated time, so feasibility may depend on very short conversations.

Declared interests

No author conflicts or funding statement are provided in the supplied text; the paper is listed as supported by non-U.S. government research.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that collaborative goal-setting or community health worker support improves chronic disease control. This paper reports baseline choices, goals and action plans only, and the final trial results are not included. The trial also has no placebo control arm, so it cannot separate collaborative goal-setting from usual care.

Read it on PubMed →